BullWiser Research

NISM Exam Performance Research

NISM does not publish pass-rate, score-distribution, or chapter-difficulty data for any of its certification exams — so nobody outside NISM actually knows how candidates perform, chapter by chapter, until now. This page is BullWiser's own first-party research, built from real full-length mock test attempts on our platform. Every number below states its exact sample size and date range, and every figure is clearly BullWiser's own data — never presented as an official NISM statistic.

121
XV mock attempts
72
Unique candidates
49.6%
XV pass rate
15
Chapters analysed
Methodology, Upfront

Read this before the numbers — it's what makes them trustworthy.

This is BullWiser platform data, not an NISM examination statistic. NISM does not release candidate pass rates or difficulty data. Every figure on this page comes from full-length mock test attempts taken by real, logged-in users on bullwiser.com, is scoped to a stated sample size and date range, and is disclosed here — not buried in a footnote. Chapter-level accuracy is computed as correct answers ÷ (correct + incorrect answers) per chapter, aggregated across every complete attempt; skipped questions are excluded rather than penalised. We do not publish a performance report for a series until it has enough attempts for the number to mean something — see "More Reports, As the Data Grows" below for exactly where each series stands today.
First-party BullWiser data Updated Sept 9, 2026

NISM Series XV — Chapter Performance Report

Based on 121 full-length mock test attempts by 72 unique candidates on BullWiser, taken between June 17 and September 8, 2026. Chapter-wise accuracy below is drawn from the 114 of those attempts with a complete 15-chapter scoring record — 8,202 individually chapter-tagged answers in total.

Pass rate
49.6% (60 of 121 attempts)
Average score
48.0% · median 57%
Passers vs. failers, avg. score
74.4% vs. 22.1%
Scored below 25%
28.1% of attempts
Average time used
54.6 of 120 minutes
Hardest chapter (by accuracy)
Ch. 11 — Fundamental Analysis of Commodities (69.0%)

Accuracy by chapter

Sorted by chapter number. Lower accuracy = more wrong answers relative to correct ones for that chapter, across all attempts.

Ch.ChapterAccuracyAnswers analysed
1Introduction to Research Analyst Profession86.6%
238
2Introduction to Securities Market78.0%
422
3Terminology in Equity and Debt Markets76.2%
404
4Fundamentals of Research84.4%
481
5Economic Analysis78.0%
492
6Industry Analysis77.1%
637
7Company Analysis – Business and Governance72.6%
521
8Company Analysis – Financial Analysis71.6%
866
9Corporate Actions78.0%
413
10Valuation Principles73.4%
773
11Fundamental Analysis of Commodities69.0%
403
12Fundamentals of Risk and Return75.7%
625
13Qualities of a Good Research Report69.8%
305
14Legal and Regulatory Environment82.6%
679
15Technical Analysis79.7%
943

The five chapters where candidates lose the most marks, ranked by accuracy: Fundamental Analysis of Commodities (69.0%), Qualities of a Good Research Report (69.8%), Company Analysis – Financial Analysis (71.6%), Company Analysis – Business and Governance (72.6%), and Valuation Principles (73.4%). Interestingly, Legal and Regulatory Environment — often assumed to be the hardest chapter in research-analyst prep — actually ranks among the more accurately answered chapters in our data (82.6%), while Introduction to Research Analyst Profession is the single easiest (86.6%). If you're short on revision time, this table is a more reliable prioritisation guide than intuition.

More Reports, As the Data Grows

We publish a chapter-performance or pass-rate report for a series only once it has enough real attempts behind it — otherwise the number is a guess wearing a statistic's clothes. Here's exactly where the other four series stand today (September 2026):

V-A
In progress — building toward a usable sample
X-A
Early — too few attempts yet
X-B
Early — too few attempts yet
V-D
New certification (launched Jul 2026) — building volume

Take a free mock on any of these series and your (anonymised, aggregated) attempt helps get that report published sooner.

Compare Your Prep Options

Curious how BullWiser's approach — free mocks, real disclosed data, honest links to NISM's own official material — stacks up against other NISM prep sites?

FAQ
Is this official NISM exam data?
No. NISM does not publish candidate pass-rate, score-distribution, or chapter-difficulty statistics for any of its certification exams. Everything on this page is BullWiser's own platform data, drawn from mock test attempts taken by real users on bullwiser.com, and is clearly labelled as such throughout.
How is chapter-wise accuracy calculated?
Each full-length mock test attempt records, per chapter, how many of that chapter's questions the candidate answered correctly versus incorrectly. We sum correct and incorrect answers for each chapter across every complete attempt, then compute accuracy as correct ÷ (correct + incorrect). Skipped questions are excluded rather than counted as wrong.
Why does only NISM Series XV have a performance report so far?
XV is the only BullWiser NISM series with enough mock attempts (121, from 72 unique candidates as of September 2026) for a chapter-level breakdown to be statistically meaningful. V-A, X-A, X-B and V-D currently have far fewer attempts — we'd rather publish nothing than publish a number that isn't trustworthy yet.
How often is this data updated?
Periodically, as attempt volume grows. Every figure on this page is dated to the exact range of attempts it covers, so you always know how current it is.
BullWiser is an independent financial education platform, not affiliated with NISM or SEBI. All data on this page is BullWiser's own platform data — not an official NISM statistic — and is provided for exam-preparation guidance only. Sample sizes and date ranges are stated above; small samples can shift as more data arrives. Last updated: September 9, 2026.