Silver ETFs emerged as wealth creators in 2026, capitalizing on rising global industrial and investment demand for the precious metal. Aditya Birla Sun Life Silver ETF FOF and ICICI Prudential Silver ETF FOF differ in expense ratios, tracking methodology, and historical return consistency over 5+ year periods. Silver ETF FOFs add an extra layer of fees (Fund of Fund structure) compared to direct silver ETFs, impacting long-term wealth accumulation by 0.5-1% annually.
Silver is no longer just a metal sitting quietly in jewellery shops and industrial warehouses. In 2026, it has become one of the hottest investment themes driven by EV demand, solar manufacturing, electronics, and rising global commodity momentum. Investors looking for exposure to silver without storing physical metal are increasingly turning toward Silver ETF Fund of Funds (FOFs).
Why a Silver ETF Fund of Fund Instead of a Silver ETF Directly?
A Silver ETF trades on the stock exchange and requires a demat and trading account, just like a stock. A Silver ETF FOF, by contrast, is a regular mutual fund that invests almost entirely in units of an underlying Silver ETF — which means investors can buy and redeem it directly from the AMC at NAV, start a SIP from a few hundred rupees a month, and skip the demat account altogether. The trade-off is a slightly higher expense ratio, since the FOF layers its own fund management cost on top of the underlying ETF's cost. For most retail investors who want silver exposure through a familiar mutual fund route rather than active exchange trading, the FOF structure is the more accessible option — which is exactly why Aditya Birla Sun Life and ICICI Prudential both offer their silver exposure this way.
The Two Funds Compared
A recent comparison report generated by BullWiser.com compared two popular silver funds: Aditya Birla Sun Life Silver ETF FOF-Direct Growth and ICICI Prudential Silver ETF FOF. Both funds received an impressive BullWiser Score of 9.1/10, placing them in the "High Quality" category.
| Metric | Aditya Birla Sun Life Silver ETF FOF | ICICI Prudential Silver ETF FOF |
|---|---|---|
| BullWiser Score | 9.1/10 | 9.1/10 |
| 1-Year Return | 183.3% | 182.8% |
| 3-Year Annualized Return | 54.6% | 54.8% |
| 5-Year Annualized Return | 34.1% | 33.9% |
| Since Inception (Annualized) | Over 40% | Over 40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.02 | 1.04 |
| Worst Drawdown | ~45% | ~45% |
| Consistency | 60.8% | 58.8% |
| Expense Ratio (Direct Plan) | 0.50% | 0.50% |
When it comes to performance, the difference between the two funds is extremely small. The Aditya Birla Sun Life Silver ETF FOF delivered a massive 183.3% return over the last one year, while the ICICI Prudential Silver ETF FOF generated 182.8% during the same period. Over a three-year period, ICICI Prudential slightly edged ahead with a 54.8% annualized return compared to 54.6% for Aditya Birla. On a five-year basis, Aditya Birla posted 34.1% annualized returns, marginally higher than ICICI Prudential's 33.9%. Since inception, both funds have delivered over 40% annualized returns, highlighting the strong momentum in silver as an asset class.
Free · No spam · Unsubscribe anytime
Learn investing without the jargon
Plain-English guides on MFs, SIPs, and taxes — one email a week, free forever.
Reading the Risk Metrics — What Sharpe Ratio, Drawdown, and Consistency Actually Tell You
Risk metrics also show that both funds behave very similarly. The Sharpe Ratio — which measures how much return a fund generated for each unit of volatility it took on — stood at 1.02 for Aditya Birla and 1.04 for ICICI Prudential, suggesting both funds compensated investors reasonably well for the risk taken; broadly, a Sharpe Ratio above 1 is considered a reasonably efficient risk-adjusted outcome. However, investors should not ignore the downside risk. Maximum drawdown — the worst peak-to-trough fall a fund has experienced — was nearly 45% for both funds during their worst phases, meaning sharp corrections are entirely possible in commodity-linked investments, even ones with strong long-term returns. Consistency, which reflects how often a fund has outperformed its category over rolling periods, came in slightly better for Aditya Birla at 60.8% versus 58.8% for ICICI Prudential — a modest edge, not a decisive one.
Cost Comparison
On the cost front, there is virtually no difference between the two. Both funds charge an expense ratio of 0.50%, which works out to approximately ₹500 annually for every ₹1 lakh invested. Since both are direct plans, investors benefit from lower costs without distributor commissions eating into long-term returns.
So Which One Looks Better?
The BullWiser report described both schemes as "Strong funds with good returns and low costs," making either option suitable for investors seeking silver exposure through mutual funds. While the performance gap between the two is almost negligible, investors may still compare factors like AMC reputation, liquidity, portfolio structure, and tracking efficiency before choosing one. Neither fund shows a decisive enough edge across returns, risk, and cost to call a clear winner — the choice comes down to secondary factors rather than the headline numbers.
The Bigger Picture: Silver Investing Is Not for Weak Hands
Commodity cycles can behave like a storm powered by industrial demand, inflation fears, and global economic shifts. The same momentum that creates extraordinary gains can also trigger brutal corrections. A near-45% maximum drawdown on both funds is a reminder that the same volatility driving 180%+ one-year returns can just as easily move sharply in the other direction. Investors should therefore approach silver funds with proper allocation discipline and a long-term perspective rather than chasing short-term rallies — treating silver as one part of a diversified portfolio rather than a standalone bet.